As a result, EAA AirVenture Oshkosh will be closing most operations for the day at 5 p.m. on July 28. Read more ›
Click here to upgrade to a newer version of Internet Explorer or Microsoft Edge.
Hands, Mind, and HeartWhat started as a handful of passionate enthusiasts has developed into a major force—and a significant component—of the aircraft industry.
Part 3: Waiver & Releases Buying & Selling a Homebuilt
By R. Patrick Phillips, EAA Legal Advisory Council (originally published in EAA Sport Aviation, February 2000)
"How can I protect myself from liability when I sell my experimental homebuilt aircraft?" This common question is one that is most difficult to answer because there is no perfect, fail-safe method of liability protection. All we can do is minimize the risk of liability based upon the total circumstances of the sale and purchase of a particular homebuilt aircraft.
One way to do this is to create a liability waiver and release of personal injury form in which the buyer waives his or her rights to file a lawsuit or make a claim against the seller in the event that a defect in the aircraft causes a crash resulting in personal injuries, death, or property damage.
A waiver and release is nothing more than a contract between two parties, and it may be enforced against the signers the same as any other contract. To be legally effective it must contain the elements of a contract. To be valid, it must clearly inform the signing parties what is being waived. In its entirety the document must alert the signer to the nature and significance of what he is agreeing to. There must be consideration provided, and it must not have been secured by fraud.
The most prominent problem in enforcing a release of personal injury is that many courts have judged them to be contrary to public policy-against the public interest. In other words, they are invalid and unenforceable where a person is chargeable with using ordinary care in the interest of public safety. In legal language, releases of this nature are sometimes called "exculpatory contracts." The law doesn’t favor them because they tend to encourage or allow conduct below an acceptable standard of care applicable to the activity.
Most lawyers and many members of the public are aware of this general philosophy of discouraging the use of liability waivers and releases. The result is that most people reach the conclusion that they are not enforceable and therefore don’t consider their use.
But two persons or entities are free to contract any agreement they desire so long as it doesn’t contravene public policy. It’s therefore expected that should it go to court, the court will closely scrutinize any waivers and releases used in the sale of a homebuilt aircraft to determine whether such agreement violates public policy. The release will be construed strictly against the party seeking to rely on it, which would be the homebuilder/seller. Such agreements may not be necessarily favored, but they are not automatically void and unenforceable as contrary to public policy.
In support of the waiver and release, courts in various states have upheld such agreements where automobile race tracks have required the drivers to sign releases of liability prior taking to the track. The courts have found the releases enforceable when executed prior to any claim and were unambiguous in meaning and supported by valuable consideration and not procured by fraud.
Using a Waiver and Release
Generally, I recommend using the waiver and release when selling a homebuilt aircraft because it often discourages claims against the seller in the event of a later accident. For additional protection, persuade the buyer’s spouse to sign the agreement. If the buyer signs it, I feel that most courts would uphold any claims against the seller so long as the seller has not intentionally damaged the aircraft or been grossly negligent in its construction. If the buyer were to have an accident and become injured, he’d most likely lose if he were to sue the homebuilt’s seller for personal damages or injuries. If the spouse has signed the agreement, the spouse would likewise lose any claim against the seller of the aircraft.
The real problem in selling homebuilt aircraft is that if the buyer dies in an accident, the buyer’s minor children could bring a lawsuit against the seller for wrongful death. The children wouldn’t have been a party to the contract and, therefore, the release would not extend to them or other members of the family who had not signed the release. Further, a parent generally cannot sign to release a legal right of a minor child.
Another major deficiency with the release is that if an aircraft were to crash in the middle of a neighborhood and cause injuries, death, or property damage to others, the agreement would most likely afford no protection.
Saddled with these realistic limitations, I still encourage the use of the waiver and release because it creates an obstacle or a hurdle that the aircraft’s buyer must overcome in the event he decides to bring legal action against the seller for some defective condition with the aircraft that caused injuries. It’s generally presumed that a responsible aircraft owner would carry sufficient liability insurance to cover any damages caused to the public as a whole.
I’m personally aware of several people who have used a waiver and release in the sale of their homebuilt aircraft that crashed and injured the purchaser. Because they executed a waiver and release at the time of the sale, it discouraged the buyer’s attorney from bringing a personal injury lawsuit against the seller.
Because personal injury attorneys generally work on a contingency fee basis, they may back away from filing a lawsuit if it appears the waiver and release may be an effective defense. Further, I have seen potential lawsuits warded off by immediately providing the buyer’s attorney with a waiver and release, coupled with the fact that the seller had little or no assets in which the plaintiff attorney could attach to satisfy a judgment.
Fortunately, for these reasons and the inherent nature of an experimental homebuilt aircraft, lawsuits against the homebuilder/seller are rarely pursued. When an attorney learns that a builder is free to change the design as he sees fit and that this is an experimental homebuilt aircraft based upon the creative genius of the builder, he may look elsewhere for a more promising suit.
The EAA Legal Advisory Council has put together a "Suggested Checklist for the Sale of a Homebuilt or Restored Aircraft" that is available from EAA Aviation Information Services and on the EAA website. This checklist gives a checklist you can use with your attorney to draft a document that will help you attain the greatest liability protection. It’s important that this document is written in accordance with the laws and practices of your state or community. Courts may look at these agreements as contrary to public policy and will seek ways to void them. It is also important that the release be in bold letters so the purchaser can see it.
The use of a release from liability may be a beneficial document in deterring a lawsuit for damages against the seller of an experimental homebuilt aircraft, but it can also be frustrating to the seller because no one can predict or guarantee the results of using it. As we can see from the seller’s viewpoint, the fault lies with the sentiments of the general public, and the decisions of juries and judges who may not be understanding or sympathetic with those of us who engage in the activities and hobbies we all love and support.
R. Patrick Phillips, EAA 124466, practices aviation law in Orlando, Florida. A member of the EAA Legal Advisory Council, he is a Board Certified Aviation Law Attorney, and holds ATP, CFII, and A&P certificates.